Munich Financial Center Initiative issues appraisal of Solvency II and Basel III
04. Jul 2011, Munich Financial Centre Initiative
Zeil: “Reciprocal effects of these regulations could make
corporate financing more difficult”
“Solvency II” and “Basel III”
could give rise to substantial risks to the financing of German
companies, should the mutually reinforcing effects of these regulatory
reforms in the insurance and banking sector not be taken into account.
“They will tend to increase the costs of securing outside capital.
Germany’s SMEs (small and medium-sized companies) will also feel the
effects of this,” stated Martin Zeil, Bavaria’s economics minister, on
the occasion of the release of a comprehensive appraisal authored by the
Munich-based Professor Christoph Kaserer and commissioned by the Munich
Financial Center Initiative (fpmi). “The reciprocal effects of these
reforms of the insurance and banking industries have received far too
little attention. One reason has been, no doubt, the lack of robust
figures,” criticized Zeil, pointing out that the appraisal provided new
findings in this area. “One indisputable fact is that the insurers
constitute a major source of the banks’ financing. Should the new rules
cause the insurers to alter their investment practices, this will ramify
upon the banks – and thus upon Germany’s SMEs,” points out the
minister.
The appraisal reveals that Germany’s insurers
hold Euro 1.4 trillion in assets committed on the long-term basis –
some half of the country’s total. The insurers are thus the country’s
greatest collectors of capital. As such, they play a major role in
supplying the refinancing needed by Germany’s banks, and thus,
indirectly, in furnishing the financing required by the country’s
corporate sector. The insurers also directly provide capital to this
non-financial sector.
A professor of business administration,
financial management and capital markets at Munich’s Technische
Universität, Kaserer emphasized that the share of Germany’s corporate
and real estate financing accruing from insurers comes to 38%. Kaserer
also proved that insurers hold 12% of the volume - corresponding to some
Euro 550 billion - of refinancing provided to the banking sector from
outside sources. This percentage rises to 24% and to 41% for unsecured
bank bonds and loans and German covered mortgage bonds respectively.
With a share of 20% of the instruments in circulation, the insurers also
constitute a highly important group of investors in the area of hybrid
capital - subordinate loans and profit participation rights.
The
appraisal foresees the pending Basel III rules’ triggering of a
considerable need for refinancing on the part of commercial banks and
Landesbanken. This need will probably be met by increasing the issuing
of unsecured bank loans. Proprietary valuations of risk, Solvency II and
Germany’s Bank Restructuring Act could combine to cause at the same
time the country’s insurers to withraw from this market - with
concomitant effects on it and on hybrid capital.
The peril of
the insurers’ reducing their purchases of bank bonds is very real,
states the appraisal, which sees the new regulations as giving insurers
incentives to start avoiding long-term corporate bonds. “Should banks’
refinancing costs increase, the costs of securing credit will also rise.
This could also affect Germany’s SMEs, as they depend upon such credit,
and as they can hardly switch to other forms of financing,” notes Zeil.
fpmi
basically welcomes the introductions of Basel III and Solvency II. The
two bodies of rules will reduce the financial sector’s risks and will
increase its transparency of operation. To counter any potential
problems, fpmi - in accordance with the appraisal - suggests precluding
negative reciprocal effects issuing from Solvency II and Basel III.
A
further thrust of the Initiative’s approach is to augment Solvency II’s
orientation towards the long-term nature of the insurance business. The
principle of the regulation has to fit this business model. This would
secure the future of the guarantee models used by Germany’s life
insurers and corporate pension plans. These models have been especially
successful. Germany’s life insurance industry has entered into 94
million contracts - these have a premium volume of more than Euro 90
billion - with policyholders, making it by far the country’s most
important form of private old-age provision. Guarantee-based corporate
pension plans are also highly important to Ger-many’s SMEs.
fpmi
views the risks issuing from Solvency II, Basel III and other
simultaneous projects of regulation as requiring the EU Commission to
undertake a detailed investigation of the reciprocal effects of these
individual measures. The results of this investigation should be
incorporated into their rules, believes the Initiative.
“Before
the reforms are implemented, studies of their potential effects have to
be carried out. A focus has to be the financing procured by the
non-financial sector. I will employ this appraisal in my advocacy in
Berlin and Brussels of such an emphasis. I am confident that Germany’s
banking sector and each of the three pillars comprising it will continue
to represent a secure source of attractive corporate financing in the
future. We have to now take the steps necessary to achieve this goal,”
emphasizes Zeil.
